Pages

All about box camera photography with a special emphasis on Ensign Ful-Vue cameras.

Tuesday 16 April 2019

Test Shots on the Ful-Vue 1.5

Some test shots taken on the Ful-Vue 1.5 (my own name for the model that came between the first version and the model II. It was a particularly sunny day in Inverness. Definitely EV15 for most of the shots. This was a little bright for my Kodak Ektar 100 film so some of the shots were a little overexposed. Meh. Just happy I got some pictures. Some of them are pretty sharp too.


A family enjoying their ice cream. Whilst not the easiest camera to use for street photography it's pretty effective as people generaly don't notice the camera at waist level, particulalry if you're looking the other way while shooting.

Ok a bit overexposed but I like this picture. It's pretty sharp, the reflections in the water are lovely, I captured two seagulls, and it's your quintessential box camera snapshot - a nice scene from a special day out.


Another nice capture of Inverness from a high vantage point. Because the camera was sitting on a ledge it was nice and still,so the buildings came out nice and sharp.



The unicorn statue in Falcon Square. Hand held. Pretty good results.


There was a little more cloud cover when I took this so the colours were captured better. I was sitting right opposite this gentleman when I took the photo, but he didn't even notice because the camera was sitting on my lap and I was looking the other way.


Another shot from a bench on Inverness High Street. Nice sharp detail.


A nice snapshot of one of the bridges over the river. Hand held. Not totally sharp but not bad.

So, the photos are a little overexposed, but I'm not too fussed. I don't doubt it's the sort of thing that could be fixed in Lightroom or similar software, but I much prefer capturing memories to airbrushing them. Besides, the lesson from this photoshoot is to seek out shadier subjects on a day as bright as this when shooting ISO 100 film. I was set up for EV 12. Would have been better shooting ISO 25. Some of the blurrier photos I took also remind me how hard it is to keep the cameras steady when shooting, particularly if trying to shoot quickly as is necessary in street photography. My most successful captures were those where I could rest the camera on something.

All in all a fun day shooting a Ful-Vue. :)


Friday 5 April 2019

Getting to Grips with Light Part 2: Light Meters

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

If gauging the light doesn't come naturally to you, or you are new to photography and not yet adept at recognising exposure values, then a light meter will make life a lot easier. Nowadays cameras have built in light meters that warn you if you're about to under- or over-expose an image, but with box cameras you'll need a separate bit of kit.

An obvious, and often free solution, is to download a light meter application on your phone. These can take pretty accurate readings of the light and you can either use them to read a scene and see if your camera settings are capable of shooting it, or, you can dial in your camera settings and then point your meter at subjects until you find one at the desired exposure value.

We saw in Getting to Grips with Light Part 1 that the film ISO will determine the light conditions in which your box camera will perform best. If the camera is set to shoot optimally at EV14 therefore, that's the exposure value you want to shoot in. Do not get hung up about shooting in perfect conditions though. That way madness lies and you'll be frustrated at all the shots you want to take but "can't". Film latitude is such that you can shoot in sub-optimal conditions without worrying too much. You'll still get good shots one stop either way. So, if you're set up to shoot at EV14, you'll still get good results at EV13 or EV15. Beyond this you'll get usable results. So you can still shoot at EV12 up to around EV17 (film is more forgiving if you overexpose - try and avoid underexposing by more than two stops, the results won't be great). Note: Slide film is less forgiving. Don't go more than one stop over or under.

Best advice is just to go out and shoot test rolls. The results will show just how far you can push your luck.

My Ikophot light meter
It may be however, that you don't want to use a mobile app and would prefer a more old-school approach (you are shooting analogue after all, some of these box cameras are nearly a century old). I'm going to make some assumptions now:
  1. You already have a vintage light meter, which may well have come with the camera when you bought/inherited it.
  2. You are keen to buy a light meter and want a nice vintage one to complement your vintage box camera.
I may be wrong, and you may already have/want a modern digital light meter, in which case, you'll probably find the information about how they work in this article helpful.

If I'm right though I can totally relate, because I bought a vintage model very cheaply and am delighted with it. Most of my Ful-Vues are from the 50s, so I searched for a period correct light meter to use with them. There are loads of different vintage makes available, and they are frequently listed on eBay and usually don't cost much. They are a nice piece of history to complement the one you're shooting with.

BUT...

Beware. There are a lot of variables in meter design, in terms of how they measure the light, how sturdy they are etc. This is a good article to read on the topic. Also, as with any second hand purchase there is a risk that the meter may no longer work. Some of them are rather old after all. If purchasing on a site such as eBay, look for item descriptions that say whether the thing is working or not.

If you want one that will work without batteries then you may want a photoelectric selenium cell meter. That's the sort I have. I have an Ikophot Rapid (above). Cadmium sulphide readers are more sensitive and may give more accurate readings, but battery availability may be an issue. According to this article on Analogue Wonderland, a good choice is the Sekonic L308, as it takes normal batteries and is highly reliable. Of course, it comes with a higher price tag.

Note: If you go for an Ikophot make sure it has its slide-on flat diffuser for incident light readings.

There are loads of different makes and models out there. This is a good primer. You can also look to contemporary literature for guidance. The book on the left came free with another purchase I made on eBay, but has some really good tips for how to use the different types of light meter in different lighting conditions.

I was also lucky in stumbling across a Focal Press guide to using the Ikophot. It's full of tips for how to use my light meter and shows example photos with correct camera settings.  Books like these are great for providing you with some mini projects to you hone your skills as a photographer. For example they school you in large shadow areas, allowing for bright skies, flat subjects, contrasty subjects, indoor lighting etc. If you become adept at metering in all these situations, ok the box camera won't be set up to shoot in all possible light conditions, but if you know in advance what conditions you'll be shooting in you can plan ahead.

You may be wondering why you should practise metering in scenarios better suited to an SLR. It's all about honing skills. The better practised you are at metering different lighting scenarios, the more automatic it will become, and pretty soon you'll be able to just look at a scene and know if your box camera can shoot it. A light meter is a tool, and there's more to using them than just pointing them at a subject. Mastery of using a light meter will require regular practice. That's why the Ikophot guide on the right is 96 pages long! Master your metering and take better photos.



1939 Advert for the Ful-Vue

I saw these adverts, which are just newspaper cuttings, on eBay and couldn't resist. I think they're fantastic. Be sure of getting 12 perfect pictures from every roll eh? Well the pics on my first test shoot weren't all perfect, but that was down to photographer error. Hands not steady enough and one accidental double exposure! At least no one lost their head. See if I do better next time.