Pages

All about box camera photography with a special emphasis on Ensign Ful-Vue cameras.

Thursday, 16 April 2020

Catlabs Test Shots - First Results



I wouldn't normally have considered yesterday's weather ideal for box camera photography. It was overcast, drizzly, and generally looked a bit miserable. It was EV 12 and didn't look that inviting. It was ideal, then, for my ISO toggling experiment. I grabbed a roll of Catlabs X film 80 and loaded it, not into a Ful-Vue, but into a new addition to the collection, a Ferrania Zeta Duplex.

This Italian box camera dates from the early 1940s and is very different from the Ensign Ful-Vues. For a start, it doesn't shoot squares, it shoots dual format 6x9 or 6x4.5. Its viewfinders are absolutely tiny. It has a choice of two apertures, f/11 and f/16, and it shoots at 1/50. Its main selling point however is its smiley face.

I'd never shot one of these before and I must say, once you're used to the huge viewfinders on the Ensigns, composing with those miniscule little lenses on the Ferrania was seriously challenging. Otherwise the experience is very much the same. Hold it still and press the shutter release.

Seeing as it was EV12, I decided to push the film 2 stops to ISO 320. I developed the film in HC110 (B) for 19 minutes. Here are some of the results.


Sheep Pen
Bridge
Bridge looking the other way
Twisted old trees
Trail of seaweed

Low cloud

Splash



Rocks


Waves


Silhouette
Clouds

Pretty delighted with the results. Catlabs X film 80 is a lovely film and there is no perceivable grain, even when pushed to 320. I shot these pictures in the late evening and by the last couple of shots the light was getting very low. The clouds shot above was the final frame, which I took by holding the camera against a signpost and then making two exposures. Upping the exposure levels a shade in post processing recovered a lot of the data, though the foreground is still pretty dark. Pleased with how the clouds came out though.

The lens in the Ferrania produces images with extremely soft edges. They certainly look like they were taken on a vintage camera.

Very happy with my first results.

Wednesday, 15 April 2020

Take the shot twice...


One way to get round the issue of exposure when lighting conditions are too dark is to take the shot more than once. This can work but obviously there are some risks. For a start, you need to guarantee that the subject, and more importantly the camera stay completely still for both exposures (unless of course you have a creative reason to want to include some motion blur or "ghosts" in your images).

In the shot below, which was taken on a Balda Baldixette, the camera moved slightly, giving a double vision effect.


In the next shot, the train station came out nice and sharp, but the car moving through the frame appears twice.


It should be stated that these shots were pretty experimental. I had a box camera that day loaded with ISO 25 film, and was hoping for brighter conditions that never came. I didn't have a tripod, so taking multiple shots handheld was never going to produce great images. However, they do illustrate that this method can produce decent photos, just as long as you can steady the camera.

Thursday, 9 April 2020

Metering Methods Part 1


Measuring light isn't always just a case of pointing your light meter at a scene. Depending on the subject, the lighting conditions, and the picture you have in your head of how you want the final image to look, you will need to adapt how you use the meter for each situation.

How do you meter for something illuminated only by candlelight? How about a landscape in the fog? How about capturing a sunset with a silhouette foreground? How do you meter for scenes with lots of shadow as opposed to scenes in bright light? Is metering for colour the same as black and white?





Average Metering
In this approach a mean value is taken of the light and dark parts of the scene. Provided neither is excessive this should give acceptable results. This is where pointing and reading works okay.

Use: When light and dark are reasonably evenly distributed.
Don't use: When something very light or very dark occupies a significant portion of the scene.

The Sky
When the scene contains a lot of bright sky, the average reading risks underexposing the foreground. Tilt the meter downwards to take the reading from the foreground. The risk of underexposure is greater on overcast days when all of the light comes from the sky.

For silhouetted foregrounds, ignore the above and meter for the sky.

Scenes with large highlight areas
The risk here is that the reflected light reading will be too high and the shadows will be underexposed.
Approach 1) Increase the recommended exposure by one stop.
Approach 2) If it is possible to get close to the shadow area so that it fills the meter's view, a reflected light reading may be taken of the shadow to ensure it exposes correctly.
Approach 3) Take an incident light reading. Stand where the subject is. Fit the diffusing screen over the meter cell. Point the meter back towards the camera. This will take a reading of the light falling on the scene and should give an acceptable exposure.

Scenes with large shadow areas
Here we have the opposite risk of overexposing the highlights.
Decrease the recommended exposure by one stop, (two if the shadows are very large).

Low contrast scenes
When the scene contains only mid tones, reduce exposure by one stop. It is possible to increase contrast in development by extending development times, though this is only practical on roll film if every shot is in similar light conditions. 

High contrast scenes
You may have to choose whether the highlights or the shadows are more important. Too little exposure will remove all shadow detail. Too much will blow out the highlights. One approach would be a high-low reading:
Get close to the subject and take a reflected reading from the brightest and then the darkest areas. Adjust the settings until you are mid-way between the two and shoot.

How does this help when shooting a box camera?
Being aware of these different approaches can help you decide whether a subject is suitable for your camera or not. A landscape with an average distribution of light and dark may well come out fine. Dark foreground on an overcast day will probably be underexposed.

If you need to reduce the exposure times, you can use neutral density filters or, in the case of a long exposures lasting seconds, reduce the length by 1-2 stops. If you need to increase the exposure (and the subject is stationary) you can take the shot more than once.

Another important skill is recognising when a subject is beyond the scope of the tools you are working with. Decide what the important parts of the scene are and then decide if the camera can take them successfully. Work with the cameras limitations to avoid disappointment.



Monday, 6 April 2020

CatLABS X Film 80 - A Versatile Film for Box Cameras



Right, having been absent from the blog for a while I have returned armed with a lot of new film to put through the box cameras.

I wanted to try and learn a new skill, so I'm going to experiment with pushing and pulling film to see if I can get away with shooting one single film type in different light conditions. It's a sort of retrospective approach to toggling your ISO. Make a note of the EV, shoot the camera, and then decide which film speed would have been best suited to those conditions. Develop accordingly.

While it sounds pretty straightforward I have never pushed or pulled film in development before, so I'm not expecting everything to be plain sailing. It's just a bit of fun with box cameras.

The film I have chosen for this experiment is Catlabs X Film 80. This is a nice looking black and white film that has a wide exposure latitude and for development can be rated anywhere from ISO 50 to 800.

When this film was launched there was a lot of speculation that it was just rebranded Shanghai GP3 film. Catlabs, however, stated that the Shanghai backing paper and tape were used to keep costs down, but confirmed that the emulsion was new. So there, a nice new film to try out on some 1940s cameras.

CatLABS X80 can be shot at ISO 50-800. This means, when shooting Ensign Ful-Vue cameras:

Shoot ISO 50 for EV 13 (subjects in cloudy bright light)
Shoot ISO 80-100 for EV 12 (heavily overcast)
Shoot ISO 200 for EV 11 (subjects in shade/very cloudy day)
Shoot ISO 400 for EV 10 (landscapes during sunset)
Shoot ISO 800 for EV 9 (landscapes after sunset)
First results soon!


Friday, 3 April 2020

Using Filters


There are so many filters out there this could be an incredibly long post.

However, some are considered more "essential" than others. For most photographers, instances where the polarising filter will come in useful will far outweigh the number of times they wished they had their trusty Cokin "Mirage" special effect filter handy.

Now, box cameras can take filters too. Usually the push-on type, although the Fulvueflex has a 37mm filter thread for screw-on types. Realistically, the filters that would be most useful for helping you achieve your creative vision would be the following:

Linear Polariser, neutral density, close-up, yellow, orange, red, and green.

Ensign Ful-Vue model 1 with its orange filter. This is a 25mm filter, but it's a little roomy, so a 24mm would be better.

Why a linear polariser? Because they are cheaper than circular polarisers. A circular polariser is made from a linear polariser with a randomiser stuck to the back of it which increases the cost. In any case, circular polarisers are only essential for cameras with through-the-lens metering or autofocus as the polarised light can cause them to give false readings, and our box cameras do neither. Polarisers filter out scattered light which can help produce darker, more dramatic skies; can reduce the shine on surfaces; and can remove the reflections from water. The only caveat is that the viewing lens and taking lens on box cameras are different so you'll have to hold the filter to your eye, rotate it until you achieve the desired effect on your subject, then attach it to the taking lens in that precise position.

The chances of finding tiny push-on neutral density filters are pretty slim, however they can still be used on box cameras. Firstly, they can be simply held in front of the lens. Secondly, if the lens mount has a filter thread, either buy the screw on filter to fit, or buy a step up adapter and use a larger filter. If it is a variable ND filter you'll have the same problem where you have to adjust it to just the right setting and then attach it to the taking lens in that precise position. However, it is well worth the hassle as the limitations of the box camera can put certain subjects in bright light conditions out of bounds, unless of course you have an ND filter. These filters can also give some excellent motion blur on moving water, to the point where waves on the sea look smooth and calm. This would be a nice creative use of the box camera's Time setting.

Depending on the box camera, it may already have a close-up feature. For those that don't a close up lens, or portrait attachment as they were commonly known can help. Many makers specify a particular attachment. The one intended for the Fulvueflex, for example, allowed the camera to focus as close as 3 feet. As a guide, since most box camera lenses are set to infinite focus, a +1 close-up lens will allow the camera to focus at 1 metre (40 inches), and a +2 close-up lens will focus at half a metre (20 inches).

When shooting in black and white, colour filters are useful tools to render certain grey shades lighter or darker. The yellow filter is probably the most commonly used to emphasise the contrast of clouds against a blue sky, but it also helps reduce blemishes in skin tones. The orange and red filters provide more dramatic results, with blue skies rendered very dark indeed with the red filter. Green filters are handy when shooting foliage as they lighten greens and therefore help retain detail in the darker leaves.

These filters will see the cameras through most situations, and will broaden the lighting conditions in which the cameras can shoot. The most useful when shooting box cameras is undoubtedly the neutral density filter. The increased scope for shooting when conditions are too bright for your film is very useful. The next most useful is probably the yellow filter (assuming you shoot black and white). Any additional filters in your toolkit will be all down to creative preferences. If you want multi-images for that abstract art look, or crazy rainbow effects around all light sources then by all means check out those creative filters.
Who wouldn't want this?


Additional filters that could be worth consideration are the R72 filter for infrared photography; the blue filter (when shooting black and white) for moody shots of fog; and a cross-screen filter for nice star patterns on street lamps etc.  

Filter Factors

In most cases you can't just apply filter and shoot. Colour filters, polarisers, and neutral density filters all darken the scene through the taking lens, so you need to adjust your exposure times to prevent your image from being underexposed. Now, adjusting shutter speed is easier said than done. At a standard speed of 1/30, adjusting by one stop would mean a speed of 1/15. 2 stops would be 1/8, and 3 stops would be 1/4. I don't know about you but my judgement of speed is not that precise. But we can't adjust the aperture either? No, but you can take the shot twice, or even 3 times.  Obviously this has implications for your subject matter. If it is stationary it's no big deal, but if it includes moving elements there may be some ghosts in your final image.

Many box cameras came with pale yellow filters built in, and these could be used at the standard shutter speed without issues. A deeper yellow filter may have a filter factor of 2. An orange filter typically has a filter factor of 4, and a red filter typically has a filter factor of 4-5. These figures are not exact as they vary from each maker, but as a very rough guideline: when using a yellow filter take the shot as normal; with an orange filter take the shot twice; with a red filter take the shot 2-3 times. Depending on the linear polariser you may need to take the shot twice. The strength of your neutral density filter will determine the number of shots needed. If the EV value of your subject is one stop too high, applying an ND2 filter will mean you only need to take the shot once. If you have an ND4 filter, you'll need to take the shot twice.

If you are shooting with an R72 filter, this has a filter factor of 16, which means 4 stops of compensation. For this I'd probably put the camera in Time setting and count half a second by saying "one and" and releasing on the "and". Or, take the picture four times and see which approach turns out best. The resulting images will show you which setting gives the best results so make sure you take notes.

Needless to say, when accounting for filter factor on a box camera, the camera either needs to be firmly secured on a tripod, or sitting firmly on an even surface.

Yes using filters would be a hell of a lot easier on a more versatile SLR that lets you look through the taking lens and then works out the filter factor itself with its metering system. The point of this post is just to show filters are still accessible to box cameras. They just need a different approach.

Ways to work out exposure settings with filters:


Divide the film ISO by the filter factor. The number gives you the modified ISO number by which to meter the scene. Eg: ISO 50 divided by a filter factor of 2 gives a new ISO of 25. Set your light meter to read for ISO 25 and apply its suggested settings. 


Another useful method that I found online in a forum, though it was a long time ago and I don't remember the source, is to count on your fingers using the following sequence: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32. If your filter has a factor of 4, that equals two fingers, which represents two stops of exposure compensation. 8 would be three stops etc.

Wednesday, 30 October 2019

Don't underestimate that plastic lens...

Now I must admit, I didn't expect amazing results from the Fulvueflex Synchroflash. When you read about it online it seems history has judged it a bit of a poor decision on Ensign's part, not really consistent with their brand. Right enough it's the only Ful-Vue camera to have a plastic lens and feels cheap to the touch. It's significantly lighter than the others.

However, when I developed the roll of film I shot on this camera I saw this:



The film was Kodak Ektar 100, professional grade film that excels at taking landscapes. Loading film of this calibre into essentially a toy camera felt a bit wrong at the time, but I was clearly too quick to judge the Fulvueflex because, well, look! The picture is gorgeous.

Here are some more of the roll:











So there you go. The Fulvueflex demonstrating that it isn't fancy expensive kit that takes great photos. It also performed very respectably at my wedding last month, so I'm no longer hesitant about grabbing this camera as I leave the house. In fact, on a recent trip to Bristol, this was my go to box camera as I was flying and mindful of my weight limit. I look forward to seeing the results.



Saturday, 19 October 2019

Box Cameras and Wedding Snaps

Captured on the Kodak Brownie Cresta III, Fuji Pro 400H
A few weeks ago my partner and I got married in a beautiful ceremony at the Royal Botanic Gardens in Edinburgh. Instead of the usual photo-booth option for the wedding guests, we decided we'd share our passion for vintage cameras and set up a box camera station, where guests could use box cameras to take snapshots of the day. It went down a storm. The novelty of shooting film again would certainly have been a memorable part of the day, and the best part was uploading the images a few weeks later for all to see their handy work.

It was impossible to predict  beforehand what sort of weather and lighting conditions we'd have, so we just went for ISO 400, one of the more versatile films that can handle most conditions. We had a mix of Fuji Pro 400H and Lomography 400, and both performed well.


Garden snaps, captured on the Kodak Brownie Cresta III, Fuji Pro 400H


Most of the wedding guests hadn't shot a film camera for a very long time, and for many a waist level viewfinder was totally new territory. For the most part the pictures came out well. There were one or two instances where people forgot to wind on, resulting in some interesting double and triple exposures. Nevertheless, we have some lovely snapshots to remember the day. The cameras used were:
Ful-Vues model 1, 1.5, 2, and Fulvueflex Synchroflash, Kodak Brownie Cresta III, Ilford Envoy, and an Agfa Clack. 

Here are some of the results.

Captured on the Ensign Fulvueflex Synchroflash, Lomography 400.

Captured on the model 1 Ensign Ful-Vue, Fuji Pro 400H








Triple Exposure, captured on the Ensign Fulvueflex Synchroflash, Lomography 400

Double exposure, captured on the model 1 Ensign Ful-Vue, Fuji Pro 400H

Double exposure, captured on the model 1 Ensign Ful-Vue, Fuji Pro 400H
Captured on the model 1 Ensign Ful-Vue, Fuji Pro 400H

Captured on the Kodak Brownie Cresta III, Fuji Pro 400H
Captured on the Ensign Fulvueflex Synchroflash, Lomography 400

Captured on the Kodak Brownie Cresta III, Fuji Pro 400H

Captured on the Ensign Fulvueflex Synchroflash, Lomography 400